[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180622135202.GD2512@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:52:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/11] cpufreq/schedutil: use rt utilization tracking
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > But this also means that we will start to inflate the utilization to
> > get higher OPP even if there is idle time and lost the interest of
> > using dl bw
>
> You get _some_ inflation, but only if there is actual cfs utilization to
> begin with.
Note that at high idle time, the inflation really is minimal:
f(.2,.2,2)
.20312500000000000000
Powered by blists - more mailing lists