[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180622151409.GA30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:14:09 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [fs] 3deb642f0d: will-it-scale.per_process_ops
-8.8% regression
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:02:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Xiaolong,
>
> can you retest this workload on the following branch:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/vfs.git remove-get-poll-head
>
> Gitweb:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/vfs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/remove-get-poll-head
See objections upthread re "fs,net: move poll busy loop handling into a
separate method"; as for the next one... I'd like an ACK from networking
folks. The rest of queue makes sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists