linux-kernel - [tip:x86/cache] x86/intel_rdt: Making CBM name and type more explicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-9af4c0a6dc1a1abf5336f2c3f951444db6b71da9@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 23 Jun 2018 05:12:29 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Reinette Chatre <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, reinette.chatre@...el.com
Subject: [tip:x86/cache] x86/intel_rdt: Making CBM name and type more
 explicit

Commit-ID:  9af4c0a6dc1a1abf5336f2c3f951444db6b71da9
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/9af4c0a6dc1a1abf5336f2c3f951444db6b71da9
Author:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:42:02 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 13:03:43 +0200

x86/intel_rdt: Making CBM name and type more explicit

cbm_validate() receives a pointer to the variable that will be initialized
with a validated capacity bitmask. The pointer points to a variable of type
unsigned long that is immediately assigned to a variable of type u32 by the
caller on return from cbm_validate().

Let cbm_validate() initialize a variable of type u32 directly.

At this time also change tha variable name "data" within parse_cbm() to a
name more reflective of the content: "cbm_val". This frees up the generic
"data" to be used later when it is indeed used for a collection of input.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@...el.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@...el.com
Cc: dave.hansen@...el.com
Cc: hpa@...or.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5e29cf0209ea2deac9beacd35cbe5239a50959fb.1529706536.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
index 2c23bb136ccc..b3da5b981dd8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int parse_bw(char *buf, struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
  *	are allowed (e.g. FFFFH, 0FF0H, 003CH, etc.).
  * Additionally Haswell requires at least two bits set.
  */
-static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, unsigned long *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
+static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
 {
 	unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
 	unsigned int cbm_len = r->cache.cbm_len;
@@ -128,16 +128,17 @@ static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, unsigned long *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
  */
 int parse_cbm(char *buf, struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
 {
-	unsigned long data;
+	u32 cbm_val;
 
 	if (d->have_new_ctrl) {
 		rdt_last_cmd_printf("duplicate domain %d\n", d->id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if(!cbm_validate(buf, &data, r))
+	if (!cbm_validate(buf, &cbm_val, r))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	d->new_ctrl = data;
+
+	d->new_ctrl = cbm_val;
 	d->have_new_ctrl = true;
 
 	return 0;