linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 05/39] iwlwifi: pcie: compare with number of IRQs requested for, not number of CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180624152352.622401968@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jun 2018 23:23:52 +0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hao Wei Tee <angelsl@...4.sg>,
        Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 05/39] iwlwifi: pcie: compare with number of IRQs requested for, not number of CPUs

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hao Wei Tee <angelsl@...4.sg>

[ Upstream commit ab1068d6866e28bf6427ceaea681a381e5870a4a ]

When there are 16 or more logical CPUs, we request for
`IWL_MAX_RX_HW_QUEUES` (16) IRQs only as we limit to that number of
IRQs, but later on we compare the number of IRQs returned to
nr_online_cpus+2 instead of max_irqs, the latter being what we
actually asked for. This ends up setting num_rx_queues to 17 which
causes lots of out-of-bounds array accesses later on.

Compare to max_irqs instead, and also add an assertion in case
num_rx_queues > IWM_MAX_RX_HW_QUEUES.

This fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199551

Fixes: 2e5d4a8f61dc ("iwlwifi: pcie: Add new configuration to enable MSIX")
Signed-off-by: Hao Wei Tee <angelsl@...4.sg>
Tested-by: Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
@@ -1509,14 +1509,13 @@ static void iwl_pcie_set_interrupt_capa(
 					struct iwl_trans *trans)
 {
 	struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
-	int max_irqs, num_irqs, i, ret, nr_online_cpus;
+	int max_irqs, num_irqs, i, ret;
 	u16 pci_cmd;
 
 	if (!trans->cfg->mq_rx_supported)
 		goto enable_msi;
 
-	nr_online_cpus = num_online_cpus();
-	max_irqs = min_t(u32, nr_online_cpus + 2, IWL_MAX_RX_HW_QUEUES);
+	max_irqs = min_t(u32, num_online_cpus() + 2, IWL_MAX_RX_HW_QUEUES);
 	for (i = 0; i < max_irqs; i++)
 		trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
 
@@ -1542,16 +1541,17 @@ static void iwl_pcie_set_interrupt_capa(
 	 * Two interrupts less: non rx causes shared with FBQ and RSS.
 	 * More than two interrupts: we will use fewer RSS queues.
 	 */
-	if (num_irqs <= nr_online_cpus) {
+	if (num_irqs <= max_irqs - 2) {
 		trans_pcie->trans->num_rx_queues = num_irqs + 1;
 		trans_pcie->shared_vec_mask = IWL_SHARED_IRQ_NON_RX |
 			IWL_SHARED_IRQ_FIRST_RSS;
-	} else if (num_irqs == nr_online_cpus + 1) {
+	} else if (num_irqs == max_irqs - 1) {
 		trans_pcie->trans->num_rx_queues = num_irqs;
 		trans_pcie->shared_vec_mask = IWL_SHARED_IRQ_NON_RX;
 	} else {
 		trans_pcie->trans->num_rx_queues = num_irqs - 1;
 	}
+	WARN_ON(trans_pcie->trans->num_rx_queues > IWL_MAX_RX_HW_QUEUES);
 
 	trans_pcie->alloc_vecs = num_irqs;
 	trans_pcie->msix_enabled = true;