[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180624152353.723760122@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 23:24:02 +0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xiangning Yu <yuxiangning@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 15/39] bonding: re-evaluate force_primary when the primary slave name changes
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Xiangning Yu <yuxiangning@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit eb55bbf865d9979098c6a7a17cbdb41237ece951 ]
There is a timing issue under active-standy mode, when bond_enslave() is
called, bond->params.primary might not be initialized yet.
Any time the primary slave string changes, bond->force_primary should be
set to true to make sure the primary becomes the active slave.
Signed-off-by: Xiangning Yu <yuxiangning@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
@@ -1114,6 +1114,7 @@ static int bond_option_primary_set(struc
slave->dev->name);
rcu_assign_pointer(bond->primary_slave, slave);
strcpy(bond->params.primary, slave->dev->name);
+ bond->force_primary = true;
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
goto out;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists