linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] docs: e100[0] fix build errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180624234135.GE3006@eros>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:41:35 +1000
From:   "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] docs: e100[0] fix build errors

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:22:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi Tobin,
> 
> On 06/21/2018 05:37 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > This patch set fixes current docs build failure on Linus' mainline
> > 
> > commit: (ba4dbdedd3ed Merge tag 'jfs-4.18' of git://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy)
> > 
> > (FYI this is 8 commits after Linux 4.18-rc1).
> > 
> > And also same build errors on today's linux-next
> > 
> > 8439c34f07a3 (tag: next-20180621, linux-next/master, linux-next) Add linux-next specific files for 20180621
> > 
> > 
> > I split the patches in between the two drivers to enable use of the
> > 'Fixes:' tag.
> > 
> > Tobin C. Harding (4):
> >   Documentation: e100: Use correct heading adornment
> >   Documentation: e1000: Use correct heading adornment
> >   Documentation: e100: Fix docs build error
> >   Documentation: e1000: Fix docs build error
> > 
> >  Documentation/networking/e100.rst  | 112 +++++++++++++++--------------
> >  Documentation/networking/e1000.rst |  76 ++++++++++----------
> >  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> 
> I am still seeing a few warnings (your 4 patches applied to
> linux-next-20180622):
> 
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:57: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:68: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:75: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:84: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:93: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:83: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:84: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:173: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:236: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> 
> 
> You didn't get these warnings?  or they weren't important?
> or "perfect" was not your primary goal?   :)   [which is fine]
>
> [I see around 50 similar doc formatting warnings/errors in the entire
> Documentation build.]

Thanks for testing this Randy.  You are right there are a bunch of
warnings, I did not think to grep for warnings on these files - sloppy
work by me.  The series has been applied already but I'll add clearing
these warnings to my TODO list.

> Anyway, much better than it was.  Thanks.
> 
> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks again,
Tobin.