[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180625100548.64222dad.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:05:48 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@...gnu.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: s390 qemu boot failure in -next
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:27:59 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Also adding QEMU.
>
> On 06/25/2018 09:10 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 06/22/2018 09:47 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> starting with commit 's390/boot: make head.S and als.c be part of the
> >> decompressor only' in -next, s390 immages no longer boot in qemu.
> >> As far as I can see, the reason is that the command line is no longer
> >> passed from qemu to the kernel, which results in a panic because the
> >> root file system can not be mounted.
> >>
> >> Was this change made on purpose ? If so, is there a way to get qemu
> >> back to working ?
> >
> > Certainly not on purpose.
> >
> > Vasily, I can reproduce this with KVM and an external kernel boot of the vmlinux file (the elf file)
> >
> > e.g.
> >
> > qemu-system-s390 -enable-kvm -nographic -kernel vmlinux -append "this string no longer is command line"
> >
> > The compressed image (bzImage) seems to work fine though.
> >
> > This seems to be an unfortunate side effect of QEMUs ways to "guess" its Linux (checking for start
> > address 0x10000, which is no longer true for the vmlinux file). With the pure vmlinux elf file
> > the load address is 0x100000 as there is no unpacker.
Do we consider these locations to be an exported interface, or is it
just QEMU guessing?
> >
> > Guenter, can you check if arch/s390/boot/bzImage works for you as a workaround?
>
> Something like this in QEMU
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> index f278036fa7..14153ce880 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> @@ -187,11 +187,13 @@ static void s390_ipl_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> */
> if (pentry == KERN_IMAGE_START || pentry == 0x800) {
> ipl->start_addr = KERN_IMAGE_START;
> - /* Overwrite parameters in the kernel image, which are "rom" */
> - strcpy(rom_ptr(KERN_PARM_AREA), ipl->cmdline);
> } else {
> ipl->start_addr = pentry;
> }
> + if (ipl->cmdline) {
> + /* If there is a command line, put it in the right place */
> + strcpy(rom_ptr(KERN_PARM_AREA), ipl->cmdline);
> + }
Check for the magic Linux string (like in the non-elf case) first?
>
> if (ipl->initrd) {
> ram_addr_t initrd_offset;
>
> would put the command line in no matter what the start address is.
I'm for putting that one in (and backporting it to qemu-stable). It's a
bit worrying, though, that our ipl code is so fragile...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists