[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9c2c1866be84dc96ce1186c5242820f290517e0.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:16:03 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dave.hansen@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:INTEL SGX" <intel-sgx-kernel-dev@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/13] x86, sgx: added ENCLS wrappers
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 06:12 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 19:09 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > This commit adds wrappers for Intel(R) SGX ENCLS opcode functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 198 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h
> > index fa3e6e0eb8af..a2f727f85b91 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
> > #ifndef _ASM_X86_SGX_H
> > #define _ASM_X86_SGX_H
> >
> > +#include <asm/sgx_arch.h>
> > +#include <asm/asm.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > #define SGX_CPUID 0x12
> > @@ -20,6 +24,200 @@ enum sgx_cpuid {
> > SGX_CPUID_EPC_BANKS = 2,
> > };
> >
> > +enum sgx_commands {
>
> This should be something like "sgx_encls_leafs" and probably moved
> to sgx_arch.h (as Dave alluded to, these are architectural values).
> "sgx_commands" is not accurate (they're only the cpl0 "commands")
> and will have collision issues in the future, e.g. with the ENCLV
> instruction and its leafs.
>
> > + ECREATE = 0x0,
> > + EADD = 0x1,
> > + EINIT = 0x2,
> > + EREMOVE = 0x3,
> > + EDGBRD = 0x4,
> > + EDGBWR = 0x5,
> > + EEXTEND = 0x6,
>
> Even though it's not used in the code (yet...), I think ELDB,
> leaf 0x7, should be defined here for completeness.
Sure.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists