linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 5/5] ima: Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180625104312.2213278-6-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:43:12 -0400
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com,
        zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     jgg@...pe.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ima: Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip != NULL instead

Get rid of ima_used_chip and use ima_tpm_chip variable instead for
determining whether to use the TPM chip.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h        | 1 -
 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c   | 7 ++-----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c  | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 35409461a3f2..2ab1affffa36 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ enum tpm_pcrs { TPM_PCR0 = 0, TPM_PCR8 = 8 };
 extern int ima_policy_flag;
 
 /* set during initialization */
-extern int ima_used_chip;
 extern int ima_hash_algo;
 extern int ima_appraise;
 extern struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
index 88082f35adb2..7e7e7e7c250a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ int ima_calc_buffer_hash(const void *buf, loff_t len,
 
 static void __init ima_pcrread(int idx, u8 *pcr)
 {
-	if (!ima_used_chip)
+	if (!ima_tpm_chip)
 		return;
 
 	if (tpm_pcr_read(ima_tpm_chip, idx, pcr) != 0)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
index 1437ed3dbccc..faac9ecaa0ae 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 
 /* name for boot aggregate entry */
 static const char *boot_aggregate_name = "boot_aggregate";
-int ima_used_chip;
 struct tpm_chip *ima_tpm_chip;
 
 /* Add the boot aggregate to the IMA measurement list and extend
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@ static int __init ima_add_boot_aggregate(void)
 	iint->ima_hash->algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
 	iint->ima_hash->length = SHA1_DIGEST_SIZE;
 
-	if (ima_used_chip) {
+	if (ima_tpm_chip) {
 		result = ima_calc_boot_aggregate(&hash.hdr);
 		if (result < 0) {
 			audit_cause = "hashing_error";
@@ -110,9 +109,7 @@ int __init ima_init(void)
 	int rc;
 
 	ima_tpm_chip = tpm_default_chip();
-
-	ima_used_chip = ima_tpm_chip != NULL;
-	if (!ima_used_chip)
+	if (!ima_tpm_chip)
 		pr_info("No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass!\n");
 
 	rc = integrity_init_keyring(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
index c6303fa19a49..b186819bd5aa 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int ima_pcr_extend(const u8 *hash, int pcr)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 
-	if (!ima_used_chip)
+	if (!ima_tpm_chip)
 		return result;
 
 	result = tpm_pcr_extend(ima_tpm_chip, pcr, hash);
-- 
2.17.1