[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5f62568-ff2f-4a04-212e-a952bf009c88@st.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:52:17 +0200
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] watchdog: stm32: add pclk feature for stm32mp1
Hi Guenter,
>> But you are right I forgot to change stm32f429.dtsi.
>> If I add a commit for stm32f429.dtsi, it's Ok for you ?
>>
>
> Not really. You are imposing a personal preference on others,
> and you would make stm32f429.dtsi inconsistent since it doesn't
> use clock names for anything else.This in turn means that people
> will have an endless source of irritation since they will need
> a clock name for this node but not for others.
Why? This kind of implementation depends on each driver. Isn't ?
Or do you mean that if iwdg driver uses this implementation (clock name
usage) all nodes inside stm32f429.dtsi should follow the same
implementation ?
>
> You will have to get the arm and DT maintainers to agree on this change.
As this patch makes easier integration of new platform, I agree with
Ludovic proposition.
regards
Alex
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists