lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL=aEXHKr5ouVdSKwG-y7xSQFLi=x1nwSjFspYiyKL1Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:21:38 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add param that allows bootline control of hardened usercopy

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Chris von Recklinghausen
<crecklin@...hat.com> wrote:
> Enabling HARDENED_USER_COPY causes measurable regressions in the
> networking performances, up to 8% under UDP flood.

Which function is "hot"? i.e. which copy*user() is taking up the time?
Do you have a workload that at can be used to reproduce the problem?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ