[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8ad7e61-342a-8d53-7de1-f30a58c91975@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:35:14 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Input: psmouse - clean up code
On 01/20/2018, 12:06 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> - switch to using BIT() macros
> - use u8 instead of unsigned char for byte data
> - use input_set_capability() instead of manipulating capabilities bits
> directly
> - use sign_extend32() when extracting wheel data.
> - do not abuse -1 as error code, propagate errors from various calls.
…
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
…
> @@ -157,39 +159,42 @@ psmouse_ret_t psmouse_process_byte(struct psmouse *psmouse)
…
> case 0x00:
> case 0xC0:
> - input_report_rel(dev, REL_WHEEL, (int) (packet[3] & 8) - (int) (packet[3] & 7));
> - input_report_key(dev, BTN_SIDE, (packet[3] >> 4) & 1);
> - input_report_key(dev, BTN_EXTRA, (packet[3] >> 5) & 1);
> + input_report_rel(dev, REL_WHEEL,
> + -sign_extend32(packet[3], 3));
> + input_report_key(dev, BTN_SIDE, BIT(4));
> + input_report_key(dev, BTN_EXTRA, BIT(5));
> break;
> }
> break;
>
> case PSMOUSE_GENPS:
> /* Report scroll buttons on NetMice */
> - input_report_rel(dev, REL_WHEEL, -(signed char) packet[3]);
> + input_report_rel(dev, REL_WHEEL, -(s8) packet[3]);
>
> /* Extra buttons on Genius NewNet 3D */
> - input_report_key(dev, BTN_SIDE, (packet[0] >> 6) & 1);
> - input_report_key(dev, BTN_EXTRA, (packet[0] >> 7) & 1);
> + input_report_key(dev, BTN_SIDE, BIT(6));
> + input_report_key(dev, BTN_EXTRA, BIT(7));
> break;
>
> case PSMOUSE_THINKPS:
> /* Extra button on ThinkingMouse */
> - input_report_key(dev, BTN_EXTRA, (packet[0] >> 3) & 1);
> + input_report_key(dev, BTN_EXTRA, BIT(3));
While hunting a 4.17 bug where some openSUSE users lost their ability to
mouse-click, I came across this commit. Putting aside it's a total mess
of multiple changes, were these changes above intentional at all? I mean
changing
(packet[0] >> 3) & 1
to hardwired
BIT(3)
does not look quite right. And if it is for some to me unknown reason,
it should have been properly documented in the commit log. I believe
your intent was:
packet[0] & BIT(3)
?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists