[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180625203353.GC19456@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:33:53 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] perf stat: Add transaction flag (-T) support for
s390
> > +bool metricgroup__has_metric(const char *metric)
> > +{
> > + struct pmu_events_map *map = perf_pmu__find_map(NULL);
> > + struct pmu_event *pe;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (!map)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> > + pe = &map->table[i];
> > +
> > + if (!pe->name && !pe->metric_group && !pe->metric_name)
> > + break;
> > + if (!pe->metric_expr)
> > + continue;
> > + if (match_metric(pe->metric_group, metric) ||
> > + match_metric(pe->metric_name, metric))
Why both the group and the metric?
I would just match the metric_name
Otherwise it's impossible to have a group called "transaction"
With that fixed it's ok for me.
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists