linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3][RFC] tools: create power/crypto utility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jBh_0Uz54-Y2-qwdJNeD+KMpGEsH7q0XOdbCq5VCP1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 23:56:43 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
        Denis Kenzior <denkenz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][RFC] tools: create power/crypto utility

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> >> > It can already do encryption. If you see problems there, patches will
>> >> > be gladly accepted to fix them.
>> >>
>> >> By whom?
>> >
>> > By me.
>>
>> Well, OK
>>
>> Where's the repository the patches will go to when you accept them?
>
> On sourceforge.

No, it's not there or at least it's outdated AFAICS.

>> >> > If you want to maintain uswsusp in kernel tree, I guess that would be
>> >> > an option, too.
>> >>
>> >> No, it isn't an option due to the dependencies on crypto libraries.
>> >
>> > Why not?
>>
>> You need a specific set of devel libraries for the utilities to build
>> and that need not be present on all systems I suppose?
>>
>> Besides, s2disk is currently tangled with s2ram which is obsolete, so
>> I'd rather not.
>
> Its not tangled.

Yes, it is.