linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-kdave tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180627085936.4f9cc4f2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:59:36 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs-kdave tree

Hi all,

After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

fs/btrfs/print-tree.c: In function 'print_extent_item':
fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:56:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'btrfs_print_v0_err'; did you mean 'btrfs_print_tree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   btrfs_print_v0_err(eb->fs_info);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   btrfs_print_tree
fs/btrfs/relocation.c: In function 'find_inline_backref':
fs/btrfs/relocation.c:602:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'btrfs_print_v0_err'; did you mean 'btrfs_print_tree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   btrfs_print_v0_err(leaf->fs_info);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   btrfs_print_tree
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function 'btrfs_lookup_extent_info':
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:871:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'btrfs_print_v0_err'; did you mean 'btrfs_print_tree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    btrfs_print_v0_err(fs_info);
    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    btrfs_print_tree

Caused by commit

  2a191bb344ee ("btrfs: Add graceful handling of V0 extents")

# CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is not set

I have used the btrfs-kdave tree from next-20180626 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped