linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180626234352.GR3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:43:52 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:04:09AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   aa838e0b70e1 ("MAINTAINERS: Add Daniel Lustig as an LKMM reviewer")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Will fix, apologies!  I must have lost the '-s' argument to "git am".

> Please sort out the "Not-Yet-Signed-off-by: tags on commit
> 
>   0cd34e83b2a5 ("rcu: Make expedited GPs handle CPU 0 being offline")
> 
> Please remember that the linux-next tree is not a development tree,
> it is an integration testing tree.

This should be fixed in the most recent push of rcu/next, admittedly less
than two hours ago.

								Thanx, Paul