linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: rename subdev probe and remove functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180626022004.GG1860@tuxbook-pro>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 19:20:04 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>, ohad@...ery.com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: rename subdev probe and remove functions

On Mon 25 Jun 18:32 PDT 2018, Alex Elder wrote:

> On 05/29/2018 06:53 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> > On 05/29/2018 04:12 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> >> Hello Alex
> >>
> >>
> >> We have the same needs (prepare unprepare steps) on our platform. We
> >> tested you core patches and they answers to our need.
> > 
> > I'm very glad to hear that.  Would you offer your "Tested-by" on these?
> > 
> > On your comment below, yes, I will re-send v2 and will separate the
> > core from the glink code.
> 
> Arnaud, despite what I said above, I'm about to resend the code but
> will *not* be separating the core code from glink code.  It turns
> out that the glink code (and smd and ssr) are really part of the
> core code at the moment.  So after talking with Bjorn I agreed to
> just send the code without splitting them.
> 

I wasn't trying to say that it's part of the core, but after reading the
patches again I see that my memory failed me on how these where split.

I'm okay merging this patch even though it touches the two separate
files.

Regards,
Bjorn