linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] fix free pmd/pte page handlings on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180626085449.GU28965@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 10:54:49 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "cpandya@...eaurora.org" <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] fix free pmd/pte page handlings on x86

On Tue 26-06-18 10:45:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 25-06-18 21:15:03, Kani Toshimitsu wrote:
> > > Lastly, for the code maintenance, I believe this memory allocation keeps
> > > the code much simpler than it would otherwise need to manage a special
> > > page list.
> > 
> > Yes, I can see a simplicity as a reasonable argument for a quick fix,
> > which these pile is supposed to be AFAIU. So this might be good to go
> > from that perspective, but I believe that this should be changed in
> > future at least.
> 
> So the conclusion is, that we ship this set of patches now to cure the
> existing wreckage, right?

Joerg was suggesting some alternative but I got lost in the discussion
to be honest so I might mis{interpret,remember}.

> Fine with that, but who will take care of reworking it proper? I'm
> concerned that this will just go stale the moment the fixes hit the tree.

Yeah, this is why I usually try to push back hard because "will be fixed
later" is similar to say "documentation will come later" etc...

A big fat TODO would be appropriate so it won't get forgotten at least.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs