linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/40] rcu: Convert rcu_gpnum_ovf() to ->gp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180626000859.23572-8-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:08:27 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/40] rcu: Convert rcu_gpnum_ovf() to ->gp_seq

This commit converts rcu_gpnum_ovf() to use ->gp_seq instead of ->gpnum.
Same size unsigned long, so same approach.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a8c19363c979..eda23797a7f4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1089,14 +1089,15 @@ static int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(void)
 /*
  * We are reporting a quiescent state on behalf of some other CPU, so
  * it is our responsibility to check for and handle potential overflow
- * of the rcu_node ->gpnum counter with respect to the rcu_data counters.
+ * of the rcu_node ->gp_seq counter with respect to the rcu_data counters.
  * After all, the CPU might be in deep idle state, and thus executing no
  * code whatsoever.
  */
 static void rcu_gpnum_ovf(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
-	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpnum) + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gpnum))
+	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rcu_seq_current(&rdp->gp_seq) + ULONG_MAX / 4,
+			 rnp->gp_seq))
 		WRITE_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap, true);
 	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rcu_iw_gpnum + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gpnum))
 		rdp->rcu_iw_gpnum = rnp->gpnum + ULONG_MAX / 4;
-- 
2.17.1