lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2352530.ePvj7nqZEq@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:55:15 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>
Cc:     lenb@...nel.org, ravisadineni@...gle.com,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, tbroch@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        rajatja@...gle.com, bleung@...gle.com, furquan@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI LID: increment wakeup count only when notified.

On Monday, June 11, 2018 7:57:59 PM CEST Ravi Chandra Sadineni wrote:
> Currently ACPI LID increments wakeup count irrespective of the wake source.

What exactly does the above mean?

> This is because we call acpi_lid_initialize_state on every resume.

I guess "because acpi_lid_initialize_state() is called on every system
resume and it triggers acpi_lid_notify_state() which invokes
acpi_pm_wakeup_event() for the lid device, the lid's wakeup count is
incremented even if the lid was not the source of the event that woke up
the system", right?

> Userland deamons using wakeup_count to identify the potential wake
> source for the last wake will be thrown off by this.

Something like: "That behavior confuses user space deamons using
wakeup_count to identify the potential system wakeup source."

> Instead increment
> the wakeup count only when there is a FIXED_HARDWARE/NOTFIY_STATUS event.

So "to avoid that confusion, only trigger acpi_pm_wakeup_event() in the
acpi_button_notify() path and don't do that in the acpi_lid_initialize_state()
path."

> Signed-off-by: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>
> ---
>  V2: Increment the wakeup count only when the lid is open.
> 
>  drivers/acpi/button.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> index 2345a5ee2dbbc..d2fe03e4faf05 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> @@ -235,9 +235,6 @@ static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
>  		button->last_time = ktime_get();
>  	}
>  
> -	if (state)
> -		acpi_pm_wakeup_event(&device->dev);
> -
>  	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_lid_notifier, state, device);
>  	if (ret == NOTIFY_DONE)
>  		ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_lid_notifier, state,
> @@ -366,7 +363,8 @@ int acpi_lid_open(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_lid_open);
>  
> -static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device,
> +				 bool is_notification)

Please rename "is_notification" to "signal_wakeup" or similar.

>  {
>  	int state;
>  
> @@ -374,6 +372,9 @@ static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	if (state < 0)
>  		return state;
>  
> +	if (state && is_notification)
> +		acpi_pm_wakeup_event(&device->dev);
> +
>  	return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state);
>  }
>  
> @@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ static void acpi_lid_initialize_state(struct acpi_device *device)
>  		(void)acpi_lid_notify_state(device, 1);
>  		break;
>  	case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_METHOD:
> -		(void)acpi_lid_update_state(device);
> +		(void)acpi_lid_update_state(device, false);
>  		break;
>  	case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_IGNORE:
>  	default:
> @@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
>  			users = button->input->users;
>  			mutex_unlock(&button->input->mutex);
>  			if (users)
> -				acpi_lid_update_state(device);
> +				acpi_lid_update_state(device, true);
>  		} else {
>  			int keycode;
>  
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ