[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180626103326.GY2558@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:33:26 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, n0000b.n000b@...il.com,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI / PM: Resume bridges w/o drivers on
suspend-to-RAM
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:06:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> It is reported that commit c62ec4610c40 (PM / core: Fix direct_complete
> handling for devices with no callbacks) introduced a system suspend
> regression on Samsung 305V4A by allowing a PCI bridge (not a PCIe
> port) to stay in D3 over suspend-to-RAM, which is a side effect of
> setting power.direct_complete for the children of that bridge that
> have no PM callbacks.
>
> On the majority of systems PCI bridges are not allowed to be
> runtime-suspended (the power/control sysfs attribute is set to "on"
> for them by default), but user space can change that setting and if
> it does so and a given bridge has no children with PM callbacks, the
> direct_complete optimization will be applied to it and it will stay
> in suspend over system suspend. Apparently, that confuses the
> platform firmware on the affected machine and that may very well
> happen elsewhere, so avoid the direct_complete optimization for
> PCI bridges with no drivers (if there is a driver, it should take
> care of the PM handling) on suspend-to-RAM altogether (that should
> not matter for suspend-to-idle as platform firmware is not involved
> in it).
>
> Fixes: c62ec4610c40 (PM / core: Fix direct_complete handling for devices with no callbacks)
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199941
> Reported-by: n0000b.n000b@...il.com
> Tested-by: n0000b.n000b@...il.com
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists