[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iEapavf-Fta9Gs8Dg8g6CDtvymAWdjT=Jng7mnjiCNxpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:18:19 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, lukas@...ner.de,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, aspriel@...il.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on
supplier unbind
Hi Rafael,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2018 12:03:44 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Vivek Gautam
>> <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Adding Ulf and Marek for their side of comments.
>> In summary, we do not want to not maintain a device link pointer
>> when adding a device link in supplier's driver, to delete the link later.
>> An autoremove flag from the suppliers side (similar to what we already
>> have for consumer side) can help autoremove the device link
>> when supplier driver goes away.
>>
>> Hi Rafael, Lukas,
>> Gentle ping. Can you please consider reviewing this patch.
>
> ISTR telling you that I didn't like the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_S name
> as it is too similar to another existing flag. That hasn't changed.
Right. I thought to gather more comments about the patch overall
before attempting to respin with the changed name.
I will send the next version.
>
> BTW, please CC the patch to linux-pm when you resend it.
Sure. I will do that. Thanks.
Best regards
Vivek
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists