[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4ad247dd1e0b4b13a2ca4e822bc569675556a7d.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:11:43 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Chiang, AlanX" <alanx.chiang@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yeh, Andy" <andy.yeh@...el.com>,
"Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] eeprom: at24: Add support for address-width
property
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 15:11 +0800, Chiang, AlanX wrote:
> If it is, I would like to modify it as below:
>
> case 8:
> If (chip->flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) {
> chip->flags &= ~AT24_FLAG_ADDR16;
> dev_warn(dev, "address-width is 8, clear the ADDR16
> bit\n");
> }
> break;
No need to put bit clearing inside the loop, something like below would
be slightly better.
if (chip->flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16)
dev_warn(dev, "address-width is 8, clear the ADDR16 bit\n");
chip->flags &= ~AT24_FLAG_ADDR16;
On top of this the message would sound clearer if you put it like
"Override address width to be 8, while default is 16"
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists