linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] tpm: rename tpm_chip_find_get() to tpm_find_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55a1a67f9c53ad8cac6e560bb23b1b712fdd4caa.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:18:57 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     jgg@...pe.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] tpm: rename tpm_chip_find_get() to
 tpm_find_get_ops()

On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 07:06 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Rename tpm_chip_find_get() to tpm_find_get_ops() to more closely match
> the tpm_put_ops() counter part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Awesome, makes sense by itself alone. Thanks Stefan. If we need
follow up versions, no need to include this patch. I would take
it even if the whole patch set was discarded for whatever reason.

Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>

/Jarkko