lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180626145532.GA6628@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:55:32 -0600
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] nvme: cache struct nvme_ctrl reference to struct
 nvme_request

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 03:51:40PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> @@ -652,6 +653,7 @@ blk_status_t nvme_setup_cmd(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct request *req,
>  	}
>  
>  	cmd->common.command_id = req->tag;
> +	nvme_req(req)->ctrl = ctrl;
>  	if (ns)
>  		trace_nvme_setup_nvm_cmd(req->q->id, cmd);
>  	else

I don't think we need to do this per-io. The request coming from the
controller's tagset, so we can do this just once at .init_request time,
right?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ