linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] clang-format: Set IndentWrappedFunctionNames false

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mcwTkmEo+CnJ2P33TrTHgXaJEpjuxQjwGx5RTXjDyvhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:05:40 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clang-format: Set IndentWrappedFunctionNames false

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
> The true option causes this indenting for functions:
>
> static struct something_very_very_long *
>     function(void *arg)
> {
>
> While a quick survey suggests that the usual Linux fallback is the GNU
> style:
>
> static struct something_very_very_long *
> function(void *arg)
> {
>
> Eg as seen in:
>
> kernel/cpu.c
> kernel/fork.c
> etc
>
> Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  .clang-format | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Resending outside the merge window with no change..
>
> If there is no clear upstream path for this file (it has no
> MAINTAINERS entry?) I could take it to Linus via the rdma.git tree, eg

We can add an specific entry, yeah. Is there any policy for "general
files" (or some general/catch-all entry)?

> as a 'collectively maintained' file.

As you prefer -- I can also pick it up through auxdisplay; but I am
not sure if we should put it in any "unrelated" tree, though. (Since
the file will not probably receive many patches, I originally thought
that it would be picked up by Andrew or some other "general" tree
instead.)

>
> Would prefer Miguel's Ack to do that though. Looks like Andrew Morton
> took the original patch introducing the file?

Yep, I sent it to Andrew and he kindly picked it up. Probably he
didn't notice this one.

As for the patch:

Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>

Cheers,
Miguel

>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format
> index faffc0d5af4eeb..1d5da22e0ba50c 100644
> --- a/.clang-format
> +++ b/.clang-format
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ IncludeIsMainRegex: '(Test)?$'
>  IndentCaseLabels: false
>  #IndentPPDirectives: None # Unknown to clang-format-5.0
>  IndentWidth: 8
> -IndentWrappedFunctionNames: true
> +IndentWrappedFunctionNames: false
>  JavaScriptQuotes: Leave
>  JavaScriptWrapImports: true
>  KeepEmptyLinesAtTheStartOfBlocks: false
> --
> 2.17.0
>