[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180626005227.30660-4-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:52:18 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/13] rcutorture: Use atomic increment for n_rcu_torture_timers
Currently, rcu_torture_timer() relies on a lock to guard updates to
n_rcu_torture_timers. Unfortunately, consolidating code with
rcu_torture_reader() will dispense with this lock. This commit
therefore makes n_rcu_torture_timers be an atomic_long_t and uses
atomic_long_inc() to carry out the update.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 971e31ae9bcf..2452e4a29923 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static long n_rcu_torture_boost_ktrerror;
static long n_rcu_torture_boost_rterror;
static long n_rcu_torture_boost_failure;
static long n_rcu_torture_boosts;
-static long n_rcu_torture_timers;
+static atomic_long_t n_rcu_torture_timers;
static long n_barrier_attempts;
static long n_barrier_successes;
static atomic_long_t n_cbfloods;
@@ -1160,6 +1160,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_timer(struct timer_list *unused)
int pipe_count;
unsigned long long ts;
+ atomic_long_inc(&n_rcu_torture_timers);
idx = cur_ops->readlock();
started = cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
ts = rcu_trace_clock_local();
@@ -1177,7 +1178,6 @@ static void rcu_torture_timer(struct timer_list *unused)
atomic_inc(&n_rcu_torture_mberror);
spin_lock(&rand_lock);
cur_ops->read_delay(&rand);
- n_rcu_torture_timers++;
spin_unlock(&rand_lock);
preempt_disable();
pipe_count = p->rtort_pipe_count;
@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ rcu_torture_stats_print(void)
pr_cont("rtbf: %ld rtb: %ld nt: %ld ",
n_rcu_torture_boost_failure,
n_rcu_torture_boosts,
- n_rcu_torture_timers);
+ atomic_long_read(&n_rcu_torture_timers));
torture_onoff_stats();
pr_cont("barrier: %ld/%ld:%ld ",
n_barrier_successes,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists