[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff6d048a-c683-56e0-13f9-1627cdfd0ea9@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:51:40 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RTC for 4.18
Hi Alexandre,
On 10/06/18 23:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Here is the pull-request for the RTC subsystem for 4.18.
>
> Setting the supported range from drivers for RTCs failing soon has
> started. A few fixes are developed along the way.
> Some drivers have been switched to SPDX by their maintainers.
>
> The following changes since commit 60cc43fc888428bb2f18f08997432d426a243338:
>
> Linux 4.17-rc1 (2018-04-15 18:24:20 -0700)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git tags/rtc-4.18
>
> for you to fetch changes up to e4302aec8a0646828a701443e303eb5ef48b37f5:
>
> rtc: pxa: fix probe function (2018-06-07 20:11:08 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> RTC for 4.18
>
> Subsystem:
> - rework of the rtc-test driver which allows to test the core more thoroughly
> - rtc_set_alarm() now fails early when alarms are not supported
>
> Drivers:
> - mktime is now replaced by mktime64
> - RTC range added for 88pm80x, ab-b5ze-s3, at91rm9200, brcmstb-waketimer,
> ds1685, ftrtc010, ls1x, mxc_v2, rx8581, sprd, st-lpc, tps6586x, tps65910 and
> vr41xx
> - Fixed a possible race condition in probe functions
> - pxa: fix the probe function that is broken since v4.3
> - stm32: now supports stm32mp1
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Alexandre Belloni (49):
...
> rtc: tps6586x: let the core handle rtc range
Sorry I am missing the original mail with the above change, but I
have noticed on v4.18-rc1 that rtc wake-ups from suspend are no
longer working on one of our Tegra boards. The bisect points to the
above change and reverting it fixes the problem. I have not had
chance to dig further, but if you have any thoughts, please let me
know.
Thanks!
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists