linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: Fix userfaultfd_huge_must

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 10:00:15 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, aarcange@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: Fix userfaultfd_huge_must_wait
 pte access

On 06/26/2018 06:24 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Use huge_ptep_get to translate huge ptes to normal ptes so we can
> check them with the huge_pte_* functions. Otherwise some architectures
> will check the wrong values and will not wait for userspace to bring
> in the memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 369cd2121be4 ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: userfaultfd_huge_must_wait for hugepmd ranges")

Adding linux-mm and Andrew on Cc:

Thanks for catching and fixing this.
I think this needs to be fixed in stable as well.  Correct?  Assuming
userfaultfd is/can be enabled for impacted architectures.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
-- 
Mike Kravetz

> ---
>  fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index 123bf7d516fc..594d192b2331 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -222,24 +222,26 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_must_wait(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
>  					 unsigned long reason)
>  {
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = ctx->mm;
> -	pte_t *pte;
> +	pte_t *ptep, pte;
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem));
>  
> -	pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, vma_mmu_pagesize(vma));
> -	if (!pte)
> +	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, vma_mmu_pagesize(vma));
> +
> +	if (!ptep)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	ret = false;
> +	pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Lockless access: we're in a wait_event so it's ok if it
>  	 * changes under us.
>  	 */
> -	if (huge_pte_none(*pte))
> +	if (huge_pte_none(pte))
>  		ret = true;
> -	if (!huge_pte_write(*pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
> +	if (!huge_pte_write(pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
>  		ret = true;
>  out:
>  	return ret;
>