linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] crypto: xcbc: Remove VLA usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ed829f4-ee39-2a46-e0d9-5c7ea584cfff@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jun 2018 19:54:12 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] crypto: xcbc: Remove VLA usage

On 06/25/2018 06:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>>  warning-3 += -Wswitch-default
> 
> This reminds me, though. Should _this_ one get moved to warning-1?
> 
> $ git log next-20180625 --no-merges --grep 'mark expected switch
> fall-through' --oneline | wc -l
> 129
> 
> Gustavo, have you checked recently how many of these are left? Maybe
> we can move this to default too?
> 

I just built today's kernel and we have a total of 704 fall-through warnings with -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2

I think we might be able to do that in this development cycle.

Thanks
--
Gustavo