[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180626200928.29aca979@xps13>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 20:09:28 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marek Vašut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: socfpga: denali needs nand_x_clk too
Hi Masahiro,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:38:21 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> 2018-06-25 23:55 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>:
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:50:18 -0500
> > Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/22/2018 10:58 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> > Masahiro,
> >> >
> >> > Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2018, 16:37:21 CEST schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> >> >> Hi Richard,
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2018-06-19 21:07 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>:
> >> >>> The denali NAND flash controller needs at least two clocks to operate,
> >> >>> nand_clk and nand_x_clk.
> >> >>> Since 1bb88666775e ("mtd: nand: denali: handle timing parameters by
> >> >>> setup_data_interface()") nand_x_clk is used to derive timing settings.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> >> >>> ---
> >> >>> Strictly speaking denali needs a ecc_clk too, but AFAIK such a clock
> >> >>> is not present on this SoC.
> >> >>> But my SoCFPGA knowledge is very limited.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> //richard
> >> >>> ---
> >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 3 ++-
> >> >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> >> >>> index 486d4e7433ed..562f7b375bbd 100644
> >> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> >> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> >> >>> @@ -754,7 +754,8 @@
> >> >>> reg-names = "nand_data", "denali_reg";
> >> >>> interrupts = <0x0 0x90 0x4>;
> >> >>> dma-mask = <0xffffffff>;
> >> >>> - clocks = <&nand_clk>;
> >> >>> + clocks = <&nand_clk>, <&nand_x_clk>;
> >> >>> + clock-names = "nand", "nand_x";
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> IMHO, this should be
> >> >>
> >> >> clocks = <&nand_clk>, <&nand_x_clk>, <&nand_x_clk>;
> >> >> clock-names = "nand", "nand_x", "ecc";
> >>
> >> No, it should be just the nand_x and ecc.
> >>
> >> There's already a patch to use the nand_x_clk and not the nand_clk.
>
>
> Different people try to fix the problem in different ways.
>
> I think it is due to miscommunication across sub-systems.
Is the series named
mtd: rawnand: denali: add new clocks and improve
setup_data_interface
still valid?
I am about to apply it (patches 2/5 to 5/5) but it looks like the
discussion is still ongoing.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists