[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180627112935.GC10102@lerouge>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 13:29:36 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: sched/core warning triggers on rcu torture test
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during rcu torture tests (TREE04 and TREE07) I noticed, that a
> WARN_ON_ONCE() in sched core triggers on a recent 4.18-rc2 based
> kernel (6f0d349d922b ("Merge
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net")) as well as
> on a 4.17.3.
>
> I'm running the tests on a machine with 144 cores:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 144 --duration 120 --configs "9*TREE07"
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 144 --duration 120 --configs "18*TREE04"
>
>
> The warning was introduced by commit d84b31313ef8 ("sched/isolation:
> Offload residual 1Hz scheduler tick").
>
>
> Output looks similar for all tests I did (this one is the output of
> the 4.18-rc2 based kernel):
>
> WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 906 at kernel/sched/core.c:3138 sched_tick_remote+0xb6/0xc0
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 11 PID: 906 Comm: kworker/u32:3 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc2+ #1
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> Workqueue: events_unbound sched_tick_remote
> RIP: 0010:sched_tick_remote+0xb6/0xc0
> Code: e8 0f 06 b8 00 c6 03 00 fb eb 9d 8b 43 04 85 c0 75 8d 48 8b 83 e0 0a 00 00 48 85 c0 75 81 eb 88 48 89 df e8 bc fe ff ff eb aa <0f> 0b eb c5 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 bf 17 00 00 00 e8 b6 2e fe ff 0f b6
> Call Trace:
> process_one_work+0x1df/0x3b0
> worker_thread+0x44/0x3d0
> kthread+0xf3/0x130
> ? set_worker_desc+0xb0/0xb0
> ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
> ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> ---[ end trace 7c99b83eb0ec64e8 ]---
>
>
> Do you need some more information?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anna-Maria
Ok so now I reproduce it immediately after the boot, time for me to debug :-)
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists