[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180627123657.2hb7ow4szjyhg5aj@home.goodmis.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:36:57 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, "Steven J . Hill" <steven.hill@...ium.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert mm/vmstat.c: fix vmstat_update() preemption BUG
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:07:30PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> This already happens:
> - vmstat_shepherd() does get_online_cpus() and within this block it does
> queue_delayed_work_on(). So this has to wait until cpuhotplug
> completed before it can schedule something and then it won't schedule
> anything on the "off" CPU.
But can't we have something like this happen: ?
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2
---- ---- ----
get_online_cpus()
queue_work(vmstat_update, cpu1)
wakeup(kworker/1)
High prio task running
put_online_cpus()
Shutdown CPU 1
migrate kworker/1
schedule kworker/1
(smp_processor_id() != 1)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists