[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180627131158.xttl27awxie2w6ia@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:11:58 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] staging: rtl8723bs: use ether_addr_copy() in
rtw_macaddr_cfg()
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> Should I add a thanks line to the commit message:
>
> Thanks to Dan Carpenter, Joe Perches and Andy Shevchenko.
>
> Or would that be considered as too much?
You can write whatever the heck you want... :P No one cares.
When it comes to credit, I do appreciate Reported-by tags because LWN
and employers do count those sometimes. I also think there should be a
tag for when you find a bug in a patch before the patch gets merged.
You wouldn't get the tag for complaining about white space and style
issue because that's easier and less important and, in a way,
complaining about style is its own reward. But so far we haven't
invented a tag for that.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists