[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180627131711.GA11531@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:17:11 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 01/24] dm: use bio_split() when splitting out the
already processed bio
On Wed, Jun 27 2018 at 8:45am -0400,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
>
> Use of bio_clone_bioset() is inefficient if there is no need to clone
> the original bio's bio_vec array. Best to use the bio_clone_fast()
> variant. Also, just using bio_advance() is only part of what is needed
> to properly setup the clone -- it doesn't account for the various
> bio_integrity() related work that also needs to be performed (see
> bio_split).
>
> Address both of these issues by switching from bio_clone_bioset() to
> bio_split().
>
> Fixes: 18a25da8 ("dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
FYI, I'll be sending this to Linus tomorrow.
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists