[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f7d0da3d-9bbd-2417-00eb-56b3a40025e2@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:53:26 -0500
From: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, joel@....id.au, mark.rutland@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, peda@...ntia.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/7] i2c: Add FSI-attached I2C master algorithm
On 06/25/2018 09:39 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 02:36:12PM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
>> This series adds an algorithm for an I2C master physically located on an FSI
>> slave device. The I2C master has multiple ports, each of which may be connected
>> to an I2C slave. Access to the I2C master registers is achieved over FSI bus.
>>
>> Due to the multi-port nature of the I2C master, the driver instantiates a new
>> I2C adapter for each port connected to a slave. The connected ports should be
>> defined in the device tree under the I2C master device.
> Thanks for this series and your patience.
>
> While I can see why it also helps reviewing to send it as a series of
> multiple patches, I consider applying the driver itself as just one
> hunk. I am not decided on this yet.
>
> I have a few comments, especially about recovery. I replied to the
> relevant patches with more detail.
>
> Also, are you (or someone from your company) willing to maintain the
> driver? Then, an addition to MAINTAINERS would be much appreciated.
Thanks for the review Wolfram! I addressed your comments about recovery,
please let me know what you think. I will fix the email for the dt patch
and make an addition to MAINTAINERS for the next version.
Thanks,
Eddie
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfram
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists