[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180627141612.GA477@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:16:12 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] printk: Deadlock in NMI regression
On (06/27/18 16:08), Petr Mladek wrote:
> The commit 719f6a7040f1bdaf96 ("printk: Use the main logbuf in NMI
> when logbuf_lock is available") brought back the possible deadlocks
> in printk() and NMI.
>
> This is rework of the proposed fix, see
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180606111557.xzs6l3lkvg7lq3ts@pathway.suse.cz
>
> I realized that we could rather easily move the check to vprintk_func()
> and still avoid any race. I believe that this is a win-win solution.
>
>
> Changes against v1:
>
> + Move the check from vprintk_emit() to vprintk_func()
> + More straightforward commit message
> + Fix build with CONFIG_PRINTK_NMI disabled
Did I miss out V1?
> Petr Mladek (3):
> printk: Split the code for storing a message into the log buffer
> printk: Create helper function to queue deferred console handling
> printk/nmi: Prevent deadlock when accessing the main log buffer in NMI
Patch 3/3 is not in my mailbox, somehow [I checked the spam folder].
I'm not Cc-ed or the message got lost somewhere before it reached my
gmail?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists