[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180627143125.GW3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:31:25 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: Bring OOM notifier callbacks to outside of OOM
killer.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:22:07AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 26-06-18 10:03:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> [...]
> > 3. Something else?
>
> How hard it would be to use a different API than oom notifiers? E.g. a
> shrinker which just kicks all the pending callbacks if the reclaim
> priority reaches low values (e.g. 0)?
Beats me. What is a shrinker? ;-)
More seriously, could you please point me at an exemplary shrinker
use case so I can see what is involved?
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists