[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5B5PS7a6SFfzX915AkRoDpeFVV7P0hrG9A51yWRFy5X_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:00:11 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: nikita.yoush@...dex.ru, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Andrey Gusakov <andrey.gusakov@...entembedded.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [1/3] ARM: dts: imx51-zii-common: create common include dtsi
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Andrey Smirnov
<andrew.smirnov@...il.com> wrote:
> We are now starting to give Andrey Gusakov conflicting
> recommendations. For the sake of moving forward, can we agree that
> this and similar comments are relatively minor and defer to the
> maintainers to make a call which way to go?
> This way Andrey has a clear way on how to move forward with this set.
The approach in this patched looked fine to me as well.
Maybe we can have some feedback from Shawn?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists