[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1530123448.7898.233.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:17:28 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, songliubraving@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 11:10 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:31 AM Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> wrote:
> In general, the changes to this function are very hard to review
> because you're mixing semantic changes and restructuring the
> function.
> Is there any way you could avoid that? Or maybe just open-code a
> tlb_gen check in the unlazying path?
Let me re-do v2 of the patch series in a way that
splits out the restructuring from the semantic
changes.
I already have code here that open-codes the tlb_gen
check in the unlazying path (not in v2 yet).
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists