lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 06:20:58 +0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guy Chronister <guylovesbritt@...il.com>
Cc:     guychronister@...look.com, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed typo on USB device ID number.

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:04:27AM -0500, Guy Chronister wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guy Chronister <guylovesbritt@...il.com>

I can't take patches without any changelog text at all, sorry.


> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> index 6372edf..6ec766b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void xhci_pci_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>  		xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_STREAMS;
>  	}
>  	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_RENESAS &&
> -	    pdev->device == 0x0014) {
> +	    pdev->device == 0x0015) {

Why do you think that 14 is not the valid number here?

Why is 15 the valid number?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ