lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180628073828.hur7njmsstg2jwvx@mwanda>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:38:28 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     John Whitmore <arigead@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] staging: rtl8192u: Use %s and __func__ instead of
 hardcoded string - Style

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:22:50PM +0100, John Whitmore wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:56:24AM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 04:34:51PM +0100, John Whitmore wrote:
> > > Changed a number of hard coded function names to use %s and __func__
> > > 
> > > Mailing list response suggest that there is a better method for debugging
> > > using netdev_dbg(). I can't argue with that, but for the moment this change
> > > will clear the checkpatch.pl Warning.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 12 ++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Did not apply :(
> 
> No worries, can I just ask is that because it should be changed to use
> netdev_dbg as was suggested? And should that be across the whole file?

"Does not apply" means you save the raw email to email.txt then download
the latest code from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git staging-next
then `cat email.txt | git am` and it fails.

Probably someone else's patch was merged ahead of yours.  Fix it up and
then resend.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ