[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180628084002.GZ2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:40:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
g@...ez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kernel/jump_label: abstract jump_entry member
accessors
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:06:00PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
> index 01ebdf1f9f40..c3524c9b3004 100644
> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -38,10 +38,12 @@ static int jump_label_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> const struct jump_entry *jea = a;
> const struct jump_entry *jeb = b;
>
> - if (jea->key < jeb->key)
> + if ((unsigned long)jump_entry_key(jea) <
> + (unsigned long)jump_entry_key(jeb))
> return -1;
>
> - if (jea->key > jeb->key)
> + if ((unsigned long)jump_entry_key(jea) >
> + (unsigned long)jump_entry_key(jeb))
> return 1;
I think you can ditch the unsigned long cast and directly compare
pointers. That leads to much prettier code:
if (jump_entry_key(jea) < jump_entry_key(jeb))
return -1;
etc..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists