[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180628092303.GD7646@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 02:23:03 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] <linux/taggedptr.h>: Introduce tagged pointer
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:06:29PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Therefore, this patch introduces simple generic methods to fold
> tags into a pointer integer. It currently reuses the last 2 bits
> of the pointer for tags, which are safely for all modern platforms.
The m68k people will have your head. alignof(unsigned long) == 2 on
m68k. Now, kmalloc always returns 8-byte aligned quantities, but
if you have:
static unsigned long foo;
then ((unsigned long)&foo & 2) may be non-zero.
> +/*
> + * mark these special integers as another type
> + * in order to highlight the tagged pointer usage.
> + */
> +typedef uintptr_t taggedptr_t;
I find this a bit verbose. How about tagptr_t ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists