[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <817fd3cd-bc10-fc63-f04f-6262230ee2f8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:00:14 +0200
From: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: staging: rtl8723bs: bug or pointless if else ?
On 06/28/18 11:34, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 10:22 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 28-06-18 09:43, Michael Straube wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I stumbled upon the following if else construct in
>>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/sdio_intf.c:618
>>>
>>> if (pwrpriv->bInternalAutoSuspend)
>>> {
>>> ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
>>> }
>>> else
>>> {
>>> if (pwrpriv->wowlan_mode || pwrpriv-
>>>> wowlan_ap_mode)
>>> {
>>> ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
>>> }
>>> else
>>> {
>>> ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> It does not matter if the conditions are true or not,
>>> ret is always set to:
>>>
>>> ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter)
>>>
>>> Is this a bug or is the if else construct just pointless?
>>
>> It probably is just pointless, my guess would be that once
>> upon a time there was a difference in the paths and at some
>> point that difference went away.
>
> Quite:
> https://github.com/hadess/rtl8723bs/blob/7d36e26f78bbc709844c12ad0c62e3e8503fdbc5/os_dep/linux/sdio_intf.c#L1757
>
So it can be safly removed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists