lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGM2reaWkmCF_DWY1jETsC=NOPC7TGFq3VX06YrTDLAp+X2+AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:19:22 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     bhe@...hat.com
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, pagupta@...hat.com,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init()

> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>

Please remove duplicated signed-off

>                 if (!usemap) {
>                         ms->section_mem_map = 0;
> +                       nr_consumed_maps++;

Currently, we do not set ms->section_mem_map to 0 when fail to
allocate usemap, only when fail to allocate mmap we set
section_mem_map to 0. I think this is an existing bug.

Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ