linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] printk: Deadlock in NMI regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180628105404.stnlihwzfgpsrl4f@pathway.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:54:04 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] printk: Deadlock in NMI regression

On Thu 2018-06-28 11:39:02, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/27/18 16:08), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 
> >  kernel/printk/printk.c      | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  kernel/printk/printk_safe.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 
> Shall we just merge these two?

Do you mean to merge files or the patches, please?

I would prefer to keep it as is in both cases.

The printk code could deserve a clean up but I would rather
split it into more files than the opposite.

Best Regards,
Petr