[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180629073707.GZ22377@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:07:07 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@...il.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
appana.durga.rao@...inx.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: autodetect whether the HW
supports scatter-gather
On 25-06-18, 11:27, Andrea Merello wrote:
> The AXIDMA and CDMA HW can be either direct-access or scatter-gather
> version. These are SW incompatible.
>
> The driver can handle both version: a DT property was used to
^^^^
versions
> tell the driver whether to assume the HW is is scatter-gather mode.
^^^^^
is in?
>
> This patch makes the driver to autodetect this information. The DT
> property is not required anymore.
>
> No changes for VDMA.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - autodetect only in !VDMA case
> Changes in v3:
> - cc DT maintainers/ML
> ---
> drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> index 7f0ab904b749..43fcc71ff287 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
> #define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_DMA_DEC_ERR BIT(6)
> #define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_DMA_SLAVE_ERR BIT(5)
> #define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_DMA_INT_ERR BIT(4)
> +#define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_SG_MASK BIT(3)
> #define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_IDLE BIT(1)
> #define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_HALTED BIT(0)
> #define XILINX_DMA_DMASR_DELAY_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
> @@ -406,7 +407,6 @@ struct xilinx_dma_config {
> * @dev: Device Structure
> * @common: DMA device structure
> * @chan: Driver specific DMA channel
> - * @has_sg: Specifies whether Scatter-Gather is present or not
> * @mcdma: Specifies whether Multi-Channel is present or not
> * @flush_on_fsync: Flush on frame sync
> * @ext_addr: Indicates 64 bit addressing is supported by dma device
> @@ -426,7 +426,6 @@ struct xilinx_dma_device {
> struct device *dev;
> struct dma_device common;
> struct xilinx_dma_chan *chan[XILINX_DMA_MAX_CHANS_PER_DEVICE];
> - bool has_sg;
> bool mcdma;
> u32 flush_on_fsync;
> bool ext_addr;
> @@ -2393,7 +2392,6 @@ static int xilinx_dma_chan_probe(struct xilinx_dma_device *xdev,
>
> chan->dev = xdev->dev;
> chan->xdev = xdev;
> - chan->has_sg = xdev->has_sg;
> chan->desc_pendingcount = 0x0;
> chan->ext_addr = xdev->ext_addr;
> /* This variable ensures that descriptors are not
> @@ -2486,6 +2484,15 @@ static int xilinx_dma_chan_probe(struct xilinx_dma_device *xdev,
> chan->stop_transfer = xilinx_dma_stop_transfer;
> }
>
> + /* check if SG is enabled (only for AXIDMA and CDMA) */
> + if (xdev->dma_config->dmatype != XDMA_TYPE_VDMA) {
> + if (dma_ctrl_read(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_DMASR) &
> + XILINX_DMA_DMASR_SG_MASK)
why not read this for VDMA too, will it return false?
> + chan->has_sg = true;
> + dev_dbg(chan->dev, "ch %d: SG %s\n", chan->id,
> + chan->has_sg ? "enabled" : "disabled");
this debug print can be removed
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists