[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180629083732.GB22377@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:07:32 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwrng: msm - Add support for prng v2
On 28-06-18, 17:04, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 02:27:10PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>
> > So does it generate one bit of output for each bit of hardware-
> > generated entropy like /dev/random? Or does it use a hardware-
> > generated seed to power a PRNG?
>
> I have some information to answer this question, although I'm not sure
> I can give a strict "yes/no" answer.
>
> There are a couple relevant documents:
>
> https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2014/11/07/cryptographic-module-snapdragon-805-fips-140-2-certified
> https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/documents/security-policies/140sp2944.pdf
>
> I also got response from a Qualcomm employee:
>
> "The Qualcomm random number generator used in Snapdragon chips
> consists of an entropy source coupled with the HASH-DRBG deterministic
> random bit generator from NIST Special Publication 800-90A, using
> SHA-256 as the hash function.
>
> The entropy source is based on sampled ring oscillators. Four ring
> oscillators are used to provide high assurance of adequate entropy.
> The entropy from the ring oscillators is conditioned using the
> 'derivation function' specified by NIST Special Publication 800-90A.
> The conditioned entropy is essentially perfect fully entropic data.
> It is used both to seed and to periodically reseed the DRGB."
>
> My understanding is that the PRNG is a real entropy source with some
> logic used to normalize the values. To quote: "No RNG uses data
> directly from the entropy source; bits in the output are likely
> correlated and unlikely to occur with 50% probability. The entropy
> post-processing is designed to turn dirty data in clean data."
>
> Based on the above, it seems to me that the Qualcomm PRNG qualifies as
> a real hardware RNG and porting to algif_rng is not the correct path.
I think Stan did bring this point earlier that PRNG is compliant to
FIPS-140-2. So it can be used by rng clients for various purposes but
should not be fed to dev/random as the hw_random does.
Herbert, can you please confirm..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists