linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] usb: typec: Support for Alternate Modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180629142127.GB21104@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:21:27 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
        Mats Karrman <mats.dev.list@...il.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] usb: typec: Support for Alternate Modes

Hi guys,

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:19:45PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Since we now have an implementation for an actual alternate mode (DisplayPort),
> I guess there is no reason to send another RFC. This series is the same as the
> last RFC proposal [1] with only minor changes. There were only a few comments.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/8/225
> 
> I've tested these with a platform that has fusb302, and also with UCSI
> platforms. The UCSI driver will need separate support for alternate modes that
> I'm not including to this series. I'm still working on it. I've used various
> DisplayPort to Type-C adapters for testing, both DisplayPort receptacles and
> connectors.

I'm travelling next week so there may be some delay in my replies.
I'm actually also on vacation, so I may not answer immediately also
because of that.


Cheers,

-- 
heikki